Working with your dot
Build a Clearer Onboarding Checklist from Existing Files with Your Dot
Use a small set of current files to draft an onboarding checklist, trace each step to its source, and flag gaps before sharing it.
Prepared with AI assistance for Mike Bradway. Sources and testing limits are noted below.
Quick answer
Quick answer
Choose a few current onboarding files, tell your dot which reader the checklist is for, and ask it to link each step to supporting material. Keep conflicting instructions and missing details separate for a person to resolve.
Start with what already exists
A welcome note, a setup checklist, and a folder of instructions can all be useful. They become harder to follow when a newcomer has to work out the order alone. Your dot can help prepare a clearer first-day checklist from material you choose.
Start with one role and one short period, such as the first day of a volunteer coordinator. Do not begin by asking for a complete onboarding program. That broad request makes it harder to distinguish your actual process from sensible-sounding additions.
Choose the source files before the prompt
Pick a few documents that you are authorized to use. Give each a clear title and identify the current version. For practice, use fictional files instead of employee records. You need the process instructions, not someone’s personal details.
Ask your dot to name the files it can actually read before it drafts anything. A connected document plugin and a connected computer are separate kinds of access. OpenAI says local-computer work requires that computer to be online with the ChatGPT app open. A file on your desktop is not automatically present on your dot’s cloud computer.
If a file is unavailable, use a supported connection or paste a short approved excerpt. Do not ask the dot to fill the gap from memory. Keep the exercise small enough that you can read the sources yourself.
Use three fictional documents
Imagine you are preparing a checklist for a made-up community workshop helper. “Welcome note, current” says the helper meets coordinator Avery at the front desk at 9 a.m. “Room checklist, current” says the helper checks that the sign-in sheets and pens are ready. “Old welcome note” gives a 9:30 a.m. arrival time.
Those files support a short checklist and a version conflict. They do not support invented account setup, training courses, forms, or new policies. The dot should show the conflicting arrival times and your version labels so you can confirm which instruction to use.
Ask for a checklist with evidence
Try this request: “Use only the three files I named. Draft a first-day checklist for a workshop helper. For each step, include what to do, any timing explicitly stated, and the source title plus section or link. Use working links only when the source provides them; otherwise give the title and location. Separate missing details and conflicting instructions. Treat the file labeled current as the preferred version, but show the older conflicting instruction for my review. Do not invent requirements. Show the draft here; do not edit the source files or send it to anyone.”
The source column matters. A newcomer may need the full instructions, and you need to know where a checklist item came from. Asking for links should never mean asking the dot to manufacture a plausible address.
Review it as the person starting the job
Walk through the draft in order. Can the reader tell where to start? Is each step supported? Are references usable by the intended reader? A link that works for you may still require access the newcomer does not have.
For the fictional example, confirm the 9 a.m. arrival against the current welcome note and resolve the old 9:30 a.m. instruction before sharing. Check that the supplies task remains a supplies task rather than expanding into responsibility for running the whole event.
Then ask for one revision: “Move unresolved questions into a short section at the end. Keep only the confirmed steps in the checklist. Preserve the source references.” Review that version before placing it in your shared onboarding materials. The draft helps organize your process; it does not approve a policy or grant access to any system.
Testing and evidence note
AI-assisted article prepared for Mike Bradway and approved for publication on October 12, 2026. Product statements were checked against official OpenAI dot documentation on October 12, 2026. Prompts, source files, people, and expected outputs here are fictional teaching examples, not measured outcomes or a completed end-to-end dot test. Availability and supported connections depend on your account. Check the official access guidance if dots is not available to you.
Read our editorial standards for sourcing, AI assistance, corrections, and review practices.
Sources and further reading
- OpenAI: Get started with your dot
Sharing relevant sources, defining work, reviewing results, and continuing the conversation.
- OpenAI: Connect computers and apps to your dot
Separate cloud/local environments and access through supported connected plugins.
- OpenAI: Control your dot
Instructions, existing permissions, action review, and the difference between drafting and sending.
- OpenAI: Meet dots
What dots do and current availability; access is rolling out and is not universal.
Continue learning
Want a second set of eyes on one workflow?
The $500 One-Workflow Review includes a kickoff, one visual map, one practical recommendation and a findings review with Mike. We confirm fit and scope first. Implementation is separately scoped.
Explore the $500 One-Workflow Review