Working with your dot
Turn Meeting Notes into a Clear Action List with Your Dot
Give your dot a small set of meeting notes and get a reviewable action list without invented owners, deadlines, or commitments.
Prepared with AI assistance for Mike Bradway. Sources and testing limits are noted below.
Quick answer
Quick answer
Share the notes, ask your dot to separate decisions from actions and open questions, and require a source line for each action. Keep missing owners and dates visible. Review the list before assigning work or sending it.
Start with the meeting you already wrote down
A meeting ends, everyone gets busy, and the useful notes become another document nobody opens. A practical first job for your dot is to turn those notes into a list you can check. You do not need an automatic recording system to practice. Start with a short set of written notes.
Your dot is OpenAI’s agent for keeping work moving across conversations and tools. This exercise starts with one bounded task. If dots is available in your account, open your dot’s conversation and share the notes there, or identify the exact file through an available connected source. Ask it to confirm which source it can read. A filename alone does not establish access.
Try this fictional meeting
These notes describe a made-up community workshop. They are practice material, not a real meeting or a customer result.
Fictional notes: “October 12 planning call. We agreed to use the library room. Mara will check room availability by October 14. Jules suggested printing a one-page handout. Nobody agreed who would write it. We still need to decide whether registration is required.”
Notice the difference between an agreement, a commitment, and a suggestion. The room choice is a decision. Mara has an action and a date. The handout is still an idea. Registration is an open question. Keeping those differences is the whole point.
Give your dot a specific job
Copy this request with the fictional notes: “Use only the meeting notes below. Separate confirmed decisions, agreed actions, suggestions, and open questions. For each agreed action, show the task, named owner, stated due date, and the exact note that supports it. Write ‘not stated’ for missing information. Do not turn a suggestion into a commitment. Show the result here for my review. Do not send messages, create calendar events, or assign tasks in another app.”
That request defines both the output and the stopping point. Asking for a list does not mean you want people notified or calendars changed. OpenAI’s controls guide distinguishes an instruction to draft from permission to send.
Check the list against the notes
For this example, the agreed-action list should contain Mara checking room availability, with October 14 as the stated due date. The handout should appear under suggestions or unresolved work, with no invented writer or deadline. Registration should remain an open question.
This is an expected review standard, not a captured dot response. If the draft says Jules will write the handout, point to the original wording and ask for a correction. Do not accept a tidy table at the expense of accurate commitments.
Read every owner and date. Check that the source line supports the action, not just a related topic. A list with “not stated” is more useful than a confident guess you might accidentally treat as an agreement.
Add one confirmed update
You can continue in the same conversation: “Update: Mara confirmed the room is available. Mark her action complete. The handout is still undecided. Return the revised list for review only.”
Ask your dot to distinguish your new update from the original notes. This gives you a simple record of what changed. It does not prove that another person received an assignment or that an external task board was updated.
Once the list is accurate, choose what happens next. You might copy it into your own notes or separately ask for a draft follow-up message. Start a recurring check only when you actually want one and have agreed the source, timing, and destination. For your first attempt, an accurate reviewed list is enough.
Testing and evidence note
AI-assisted article prepared for Mike Bradway and approved for publication on October 12, 2026. Product statements were checked against official OpenAI dot documentation on October 12, 2026. Prompts, source files, people, and expected outputs here are fictional teaching examples, not measured outcomes or a completed end-to-end dot test. Availability and supported connections depend on your account. Check the official access guidance if dots is not available to you.
Read our editorial standards for sourcing, AI assistance, corrections, and review practices.
Sources and further reading
- OpenAI: Get started with your dot
Sharing relevant sources, defining work, reviewing results, and continuing the conversation.
- OpenAI: Connect computers and apps to your dot
Separate cloud/local environments and access through supported connected plugins.
- OpenAI: Control your dot
Instructions, existing permissions, action review, and the difference between drafting and sending.
- OpenAI: Meet dots
What dots do and current availability; access is rolling out and is not universal.
Continue learning
Want a second set of eyes on one workflow?
The $500 One-Workflow Review includes a kickoff, one visual map, one practical recommendation and a findings review with Mike. We confirm fit and scope first. Implementation is separately scoped.
Explore the $500 One-Workflow Review